Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Google Doodles of 2012


Google Doodles of 2012

FDA probing reports of energy-drink deaths



Amid increasing scrutiny of the fast-growing energy drink industry, federal health officials are investigating reports that five people have died since 2009 after consuming Monster Beverage Corp.'s energy drinks.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration said it hadn't established a link between Monster energy drinks and the reports it has received concerning five deaths and another non-fatal heart attack. The government inquiry comes after a Maryland couple sued the Corona company last week in California for negligence and wrongful death in connection with the death of their 14-year-old daughter, Anais Fournier.
She is one of the five reported deaths, which came to light in a public-records request filed in her case, her lawyers said.
These disclosures triggered a sell-off Monday in Monster Beverage shares, which plummeted $7.59, or 14%, to $45.73.
A spokesman for Monster Beverage said the company "does not believe that its beverages are in any way responsible for the death of Ms. Fournier" and said it intends to vigorously defend itself in the case. The company added that it's "unaware of any fatality anywhere that has been caused by its drinks."
As part of its safety surveillance, the FDA routinely receives reports of adverse events tied to certain consumer products, drugs and medical devices. FDA spokeswoman Shelly Burgess said the agency is looking into the Monster reports but hadn't reached any conclusions about any "causal link."
Some lawmakers and consumer advocates are calling for tougher regulation of energy drinks sold by Monster, Red Bull and beverage giants such as Coca-Cola Co. and PepsiCo Inc. These highly caffeinated and sometimes sugar-laden drinks, including top sellers 5-Hour Energy and Rockstar, have become popular pick-me-ups for a wide range of consumers and are heavily marketed as a way to boost performance, focus or overall health.
Last year, energy drink sales grew nearly 17%, according to industry publication Beverage Digest, and Monster led the industry with a 35% market share. Monster's net sales rose 28% to $592.6 million in the quarter ended June 30 compared with the same period a year ago.
In April, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.) asked the FDA to investigate the caffeine levels and safety of other additives in energy drinks, particularly in light of their appeal among young people. Durbin noted that one 16-ounce can of Monster has 160 milligrams of caffeine, equivalent to almost five cans of a regular soft drink. The American Academy of Pediatrics advises against adolescents' consuming more than 100 milligrams of caffeine daily.
The FDA has authority to regulate caffeine levels in soft drinks, and the limit in a 12-ounce soda is about 71 milligrams. But most energy drinks exceed those levels because they are labeled as dietary supplements. Critics call for energy-drink makers to provide regulators with evidence that common additives in the drinks, such as guarana, taurine and ginseng, are safe when combined with other ingredients.
A federal report last year called energy-drink consumption a rising public health concern because excessive caffeine intake can cause medical and behavioral issues. Emergency-room visits related to energy drinks jumped from 1,128 in 2005 to 13,114 in 2009, according to the report by theSubstance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.
The FDA spokeswoman said the agency is looking into the "emerging science" on a variety of ingredients, including caffeine.
In the lawsuit filed last week, Wendy Crossland and Richard Fournier said their daughter had consumed two 24-ounce Monster energy drinks in a 24-hour period in December. A few hours after drinking the second can of Monster, Anais Fournier went into cardiac arrest and never regained consciousness, according to the suit. Her autopsy report attributed her death to "cardiac arrhythmiadue to caffeine toxicity."
The family alleges that Monster fails to warn consumers about the potential risks related to its drinks.
"The downsides are not printed anywhere on these cans," said Alexander R. Wheeler, a Los Angeles attorney representing Anais' parents. "Her parents want to make sure this never happens to another family."
A spokesman for Monster said the company's "ingredients and labeling are in full compliance with all laws and regulations governing beverage products in each of the more than 70 countries in which it is sold."

Anonymous Hackers Claim to Have Planted Bomb in Government Building


They call themselves Anonymous hackers, but their ways of attracting attention don’t seem to be in line with the ones utilized by other hacktivists. Now, the controversial Fawkes Security collective has even started making bomb threats to promote the protests programmed to take place on November 5, 2012.
“As of today 200 kilograms of composite Nitroglycerin and commercial explosives have effectively been concealed in a government building, situated in the United States of America. On the 5th of November, 2012, the device will detonate remotely via the transmission control protocol, leaving behind severe consequences,” the hackers stated.

“We would like to advise that the contraption is built inside a tamper proof apparatus sensitive to physical intrusions or attempted disarmament, thus resulting in the desired effect if the military grade device is found before the 5th of November,” they added. 

“There is no intention, risks or circumstances what so ever to cause harm to innocent people, but we cannot, say the same for the people who are the real terrorists, oppressors and war creators.”

Other hacktivists have already started condemning the ways of the group, calling their acts “spewing violent rhetoric under the name of Anonymous.”

This is not the first time when Fawkes Security sparks controversy. After the Amanda Todd incident broke out, they released a video claiming that the girl didn’t exist. They claimed that everything was part of a propaganda campaign. 

Then, a few days later, they took credit for taking down several websites owned by HSBC, including the ones from Canada, France, the United Kingdom and the United States. 

It’s uncertain if the bomb threats made by the hackers are real or not. However, making such threats against the US government is serious business, even if they’re just a joke or a marketing campaign for the November 5 protests.

A few months ago, when someone made bomb threats against the University of Pittsburgh, the FBI went all the way to Austria to find evidence about the culprit’s identity.

FTC Accuses Compete Inc. of Failing to Protect User Data, Deceiving Customers

The US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has accused web analytics company Compete Inc. of deceiving its customers and failing to properly protect the sensitive information it has collected from them. In order to settle the FTC’s charges, the firm has promised to clean up its act.

Compete utilizes tracking software to collect data on browsing habits. The reports are sold to companies which want to improve their sales and web statistics.

However, the FTC found that the methods utilized by the company weren’t quite orthodox. To get users to install the software on their computers, Compete urged them to join a “Consumer Input Panel” which would presumably enable them to win rewards.

Another piece of software utilized by the company was a toolbar, which allegedly offered users “instant access” to details about the sites they were accessing.

The problem was that the firm didn’t collect only information on browsing behavior. The software installed on the customers’ computers allowed them to silently record all the information entered by users on websites, including usernames, passwords, credit card details, security codes, social security numbers and more.

The company ensured users that all data was stripped of personally identifiable information before being stored on their servers. However, in reality, Compete has not only collected all the data, but it has also failed to ensure that it’s transmitted and stored in a safe manner.

Compete has agreed to ensure that from now on its customers are made aware that their details are being collected. The organization has also promised to anonymize or delete the sensitive information it harvests, and to provide instructions on how its software can be uninstalled.

Furthermore, the firm will have to implement a comprehensive information security program and perform independent third-party audits every two years for the next 20 years.

Monday, October 1, 2012

ProjectWestWind: Hackers Leak 120,000 Records from World’s Top 100 Universities


At the end of August, hackers part of Team GhostShell published the details of around 1 million accounts stolen from over 100 websites worldwide as part of an operation calledProject HellFire. Now, the collective has turned its attention to the world’s top 100 educational institutions in what they call Project WestWind.
“We have set out to raise awareness towards the changes made in today's education, how new laws imposed by politicians affect us, our economy and overall, our way of life,” the hackers explained.

“How far we have ventured from learning valuable skills that would normally help us be prepared in life, to just, simply memorizing large chunks of text in exchange for good grades? How our very own traditions are heard less and less, losing touch with who we truly are? Slowly casting the identities, that our ancestors fought to protect, into exile.”

The list of affected universities includes Harvard, Cambridge, Stanford, Princeton, John Hopkins, Imperial College London, University of Michigan, Tokyo University, University of Wisconsin, University of Pennsylvania, Cornell University, Kyoto University, University of Houston, Linkoping University and New York University.

The University of Edinburgh, University of Maryland, University of British Columbia, University of Texas, University of Colorado, Duke University, Rutgers University, Manchester University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Zurich, University of Florida, University of Berlin, Utrecht University and Osaka University have also been targeted.

However, the list of victims doesn’t end there. It continues with Heidelberg University, Moscow State University, University of Freiburg, Boston University, Texas A&M University, McMaster University, University of Gottingen, Purdue University and many others.

The hackers claim they could have stolen hundreds of thousands of record sets, just as they did last time, but they only published around 120,000 to “keep the leaked information to a minimum.”

Furthermore, they claim that many of the servers they penetrated are highly unsecure, some of them even hosting malware, despite the fact that they store credit card details.